Showing posts with label health care. Show all posts
Showing posts with label health care. Show all posts

Thursday, April 30, 2009

Swine Flu: the good, the bad, and the ugly


Earlier today, a friend asked me for my take on the swine flu, so I wrote a long email, decided to research it a little more to make sure my thoughts were valid, and put up an edited version of that email here. So here are my thoughts:

[disclaimer: I am a virology/cell bio/micro grad student so I have some knowledge in this area and have cited my information below; however, I do not in any way claim to be an expert on influenza. Many parts of this are also over simplified for readability.]

Why do viruses make us sick?
Let's start with a basic question because this will help you understand more later on. At the most basic level a virus is some sort of nucleic acid (a blue print) surrounded by protein, many have other accessories as well. It's only goal is to make more of itself; that's it. It really doesn't care if its host lives or dies as long as it can reproduce itself. This presents a problem because when the virus replicates itself, it shuts off the rest of the cell's function--it can't do anything besides make more virus. If the virus infects enough cells, then you've got tissue with limited function, etc. Your body takes care of this though with your immune system. Your body recognizes that there's something foreign there and begins an generic immune response to limit the infection. It then communicates through signaling pathways to recruit defenses--white bloods cells that will get rid of the infection (this is what causes inflammation). Your body can then mount a specific response to fight the specific virus. This is relatively easy for your body to do when it has encountered the pathogen (or disease-causing agent) before or something similar to it. This is why you only get chicken pox once and why vaccines work. Your body has a memory and can fight quickly and efficiently this way. However, if it is a new pathogen, it's not as easy or efficient. Viruses also have ways to trick your immune system by hiding from it or "breaking" parts of it. Different viruses have different levels of virulence (ability to cause disease)--this means that some are better at making you sick than others. A viral infection like the flu is a localized infection. This means that it infects your respiratory system in this case and then replicates there without spreading to the rest of the body; however, if the immune system doesn't tackle it and other tissues are permissive to infection, it could spread causing an even bigger problem.

But people get the flu every year...
This is true people get the flu and many people die from human strains every year (>300,000 worldwide, 10% of these in USA). However, most of those deaths occur in people >65 years old (1) and often as a result of secondary infection (eg pneumonia on top of viral infection). So if you're middle-aged and in good health, you may feel like crap for a couple weeks but your immune system can fight it off. Human flu strains are endemic in many areas of the world--this means the virus is present at a stable rate in a population. An epidemic occurs when there is an increase in this steady state. A pandemic occurs when the virus spreads across a wide region or the whole world. The 1918 flu pandemic is estimated to have killed 20-100 million people worldwide (1). But don't freak out yet... just keep reading.

So how's swine flu different?
Viruses have host specificity--they can't infect every type of animal or plant. In flu, this is due to two proteins: hemagglutinin and neuraminadase. This is where the H and N numbers come from. These two proteins are found on the outside of the virus and they attach to receptors on the surface of the cell to allow the virus to enter. If they can't attach, it can't infect. So up until now, swine flu only attached to a pig-specific receptor and couldn't recognize the human one. The unfortunate thing is: the H and N proteins can mutate and evolve really easily. That's why you have to get a flu shot every year--because they change! In the case of the swine flu, we knew about it several years ago (2) but it couldn't infect humans at the time. Now, it's evolved to be able to. These H and N proteins are main targets recognized from host immune response, so if they change significantly, you're body won't be able to mount a specific response as quickly. Also, some strains of virus are more virulent than others--this also is dependent on how well the H and N proteins can bind to the cell, how efficient virus replication is, and the ability to block the immune response, among other things. Part of this virulence with the flu can also be the way it can mix and match. It's genome is made up of 8 segments. Swine are kind of a "mixing bowl" since they have receptors that are recognized by swine, human, and avian flu viruses so all of these viruses can mix and match in a pig, leading to a much more dangerous one (2).

Another big issue right now with the swine flu, is that it is being transmitted human to human. So it's not just going from pig to human, which would keep it more contained. It's going human to human (Flu is transmitted by aersol--saliva droplets when you cough/sneeze), and given the possibility of transcontinental and international travel that makes it a lot easier to spread.

Does it live up to the hype?
Yes and no. It is a legitimate health concern and precautions should be taken (are being taken) to limit the spread of the virus if at all possible. From what I understand, they're still not sure how easily it's being transmitted and how virulent it really is. So we shouldn't ignore it and I would encourage you to stay informed. Specifically I would suggest listening to the Center for Disease Control (cdc.gov) and the World Health Organization (who.int) before anyone else; the media is having a hay day with and exaggerating it, I think. You should also take normal flu season precautions: wash your hands after using the restroom and before eating, avoid touching your face (esp your mouth) with your hands, see a doctor and stay home from work/school if you're feeling sick.

So there's my take on it. And to paraphrase my PI: I don't know if the realistic concern is really as severe as the perceived concern [by the media].
_________________________________________________

1. Taronna R. Maines, et al. (2008). "Pathogenesis of emerging avian influenza viruses in mammals and the host innate immune response." Immunological Reviews 225(1): 68-84.

2. Wuethrich, B. (2003). "Chasing the Fickle Swine Flu." Science 299(5612): 1502.

3. All general virology info came from "Principles in Virology" by SJ Flint et al. If you want the full citation, I can give it to you, but I don't have the book at my desk right now.

Monday, April 27, 2009

On the bright side...

Flu cases show need for science spending

The outbreak of a flu virus that has led to a U.S. public health emergency highlights the need for a strong government commitment to scientific research, President Barack Obama said on Monday.

...............................................................

"One thing is clear -- our capacity to deal with a public health challenge of this sort rests heavily on the work of our scientific and medical community," Obama said. "And this is one more example of why we cannot allow our nation to fall behind."

Thursday, November 29, 2007

Conflict of Interest

For the love of money is a root of all kinds of evils. --1 Timothy 6:10

We all know the trouble that money can cause. The Bible obviously tells us to be cautious of money. But oh, how easy it is to forget. Tonight I went to a meeting about the pharmaceutical industry. The focus of this meeting had nothing to do with money; it actually consisted of 4 IU bio alumi who currently work for companies such as Cook, Baxter, and Eli Lilly, all discussing how they came to work in pharmaceuticals. It was very informational and I am assured that the kind of job I would like to have after school actually exists!

One of the speakers talked about different aspects of pharmaceutical business including ethics. During part of his presentation he gave us a couple of situations that were conflicts of interest. He then proceeded to tell us about some of the regulation that is required in industry to ensure that these problems are dealt with ethically. One situation he gave us was that of a doctor. This hypothetical doctor is paid through a "fee for service" process. In this case, he gets paid per patient per procedure instead of a salary. Now, the job of a doctor is to take care and try to improve a patient's health. It is fair to say that a doctor's job relies on sickness and disease. When you add in the "fee for service" aspect, there is potential for problems. Where do the doctor's priorities lie now? Does he put the patient first and give them the best health care possible at any given time? Or does the love of making more money take over? Conflict of interest. One would hope that a doctor's priority would lie with the patient. My optimistic side assumes that this is the case with most doctors--that they truly care for their patient's well-being. However, I have no doubt that making money is the draw for some doctors.

Health care brings up some very real issues regarding the evils of money--the one mentioned above being one of them. Another interesting aspect is that of pharmaceutical drugs (also brought up by this speaker.) There is sickness and disease in the world. Scientists and doctors have found ways to treat and cure many problems. Treatment (surgeries, medicine, etc.) cost money. Companies that produce these products have costs to deal with and also have to make a profit in order to stay in business. Where do you draw the line here? Our dream is to help those that are ailing. Reality is that everything costs something. How do we maintain the right priorities (people before money) while still being realistic? I don't have an answer. Something to think about.

In life in general, I think the main way to do this is to keep our eyes on the real prize.

No one can serve two masters. Either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve both God and Money. --Matthew 6:24

If we are relying fully on God, then money becomes less important. We aren't attached to material things here on earth. After all, you can't take it with you.

Do not store up for yourselves treasures on earth, where moth and rust destroy, and where thieves break in and steal. But store up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where moth and rust do not destroy, and where thieves do not break in and steal. For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also. --Matthew 6:19-21

I think complete trust in God to fulfill our needs is the only way to truly dissolve the hold that money has on us.

So do not worry, saying, 'What shall we eat?' or 'What shall we drink?' or 'What shall we wear?' 32For the pagans run after all these things, and your heavenly Father knows that you need them. 33But seek first his kingdom and his righteousness, and all these things will be given to you as well. --Matthew 6: 31-33

Take home point(s): Don't rely on money. Do not make it a top priority. Make heavenly things your treasure. Trust God to supply your needs.

Easier said than done, right?